A Report on Lifeline for Children’s Choir Directors Essay -- Choir Cho

Mrs. Bartle employs a little bit of four of each of the methods shared in (the call pedagogy) class. She uses a lot of the Westminister method but borrows from the others. The others she borrows from are Christiansen, Fred Warning and Wilson/Klein. Much of what she writes, is from her own lifes career experiences as a choral director. The starting time subject she deals with is the directors attitude. A director should have a positive attitude. (p. 3, Bartle) In chapter two she discusses the development of a childs representative in a mechanistic way. She wants the flutety sound of a childs voice developed, between the ages 6-8. (ps. 7-9) This reminds me of the Westminister method. She tells how to help a child that has problems sing on revolve about. (ps. 13-15.) She tells how to help children pronounce their vowels when they sing. She does this by demonstrating the position of the jaw with a rubber band. She also teaches children how to form vowels and diphthongs with their mou ths. (ps. 19-21) She gives some mechanistic methods on how to develop good diction with nonsense word drills and by exaggerating consonants as they whisper words. (ps. 22-3) This reminds me of the Fred Warning emphasis on good pronunciation. She gives some reasons why a childrens choir may sing flat or sharp, and then gives some mechanistic ways to fix them. (p. 27) A choir director must fix his own hearing, forrader they can get to first base, with their choir members. They can do this by listening to some Bach chorales, then leave them for a week, line up back and play them several times, then write them down on a manuscript. (p. 27) She discusses the many ways of teaching children rhythm, but she also advises, let us not disregard the old. (ps. 28-9) She a... ...aguarthe loyalty of a Dogthe charm of a Kitten and the appearance of a SeaIt would also be reformative if he hasa bag full of tricksa head full of Toolsa lifetime of Ideasa background of a few failures as surface a s success anda heart full of hope and faith in people. (ps. 155-6)At the very end of the book, she has a bibliography of twenty-six sources, and six commentators of differentiation such as Sir David Willcocks. (ps.157-9) I enjoyed reading this book. This book would be a handy aid in assisting any Childrens Choir Director. I like the way she borrows from a lot of methodologies to develop her own. By burrowing she has developed a very good way to direct choirs.Work Cited.Bartle, Jean Ashworth Lifeline for Childrens Choir Directors.Published by Gordon V. Thompson Music, a Division of Canada Publishing Corporation. Toronto, Canada. 1988.

Linux :: essays research papers

LINUXOne of the up and coming server operating systems is Linux. In an article from CNET intelligence operation on July 24, 2000, a new study has identified Linux as being a signifi heapt threat to Microsoft in the server market over the coterminous few years. What is Linux and how is it making its impact on the server industry? This paper will answer these questions.Linux What is it?Linux is a free Unix-type operating system originally created by Linus Torvalds along with other developers in the industry. Linux is an independent POSIX (Portable Operating System Interface) implementation and includes true multi-tasking, virtual memory, shared libraries, TCP/IP networking and other features consistent with Unix-type systems.Linux was genuine under the GNU General Public Licensing and all of its source code is freely available to everyone. This doesnt necessarily mean that the program and all of the distributed software product is free. There are companies and developers that may charge money for the program as long as the source code remains available.Linux In Business?Linux is decent more and more used in business today. One of the main reasons is the cost-effectiveness of the operating system itself. As well, there are numerous articles all over the Internet and news media detailing the positive aspects of open source operating systems in business today. One reference found on the Open ascendent website describes the basic idea behind open source code. When programmers on the Internet can read, redistribute, and modify the source for a piece of software, it evolves. People improve it, the striking unwashed adapt it, and people fix bugs. And this can happen at a speed that, if one is used to the slow pace of conventional software development, seems astonishing. (Open Source, shocking 2000)From a businesspersons standpoint, the open-source model has a lot to offer. Companies are now able to build open standards as actual software and many companies and individuals can collaborate on a product that none of them could achieve alone. With open source code, there can be rapid bug fixes and changes that the user asks for, do to the users own schedule. Other positives are increased security and increased reliability, and yet another positive is the ability of Linux to run on systems as low-end as a 386 to the higher end systems such as Alpha and Sparcs.Where is Linux Headed?Based on the reports and studies being conducted by independent firms around the world, it is very apparent that Linux is making great strides in the networking market.

Alvarez Shows Language Is A Tremendous Difference In Everyones Lives :: essays research papers

Alvarez Shows Language is A Tremendous Difference In Everyones Lives In HisStoryRudy and Yolanda communicated in completely different languages. Bylanguage, I toy with the written, and spoken kind. More so I mean the traditions,and values that go hand in hand with learning a language. When they learnedtheir own languages, they genetic their own set of ideals, that were changedby what, where, and how they were taught.Yolandas language was Spanish. She learned to speak Spanish in theDominican Republic. Her lifestyle was one of a strict Catholic girl. Yo had avery traditional father. He allowed nothing but what was the social norm. Hissocial norms became hers. When she moved to the U.S., she was completely naivewhen it came to the American culture. Yolanda was raised in the way that the delectationof drugs and alcohol were totally unheard of. Pre-marital sex was something thatwas taboo, and strictly reinforced. She had grown up with very traditionalvalues that were adopted from her mother and her father. She was never exposedto every outside stimuli. Whether or not it was voluntary, she was forced toconform to the rigid Hispanic values. This conformity kept her at bay. Shecouldnt experience the things necessary to become a substantial person.Rudolf B. Elmhurst was a young man from a liberal family in the UnitedStates. His parents were easy-going people, with thoughts of letting Rudydevelop on his own. He learned English much the kindred way Yolanda learned Spanish.He was taught by his parents. He also absorbed the culture around him and helearned the American way of doing things. Rudy had quite a bit of freedom. Hecould have come and gone as he pleased. He had no restrictions, and was allowedto grow freely. With that opportunity Rudolf Brodermann Elmenhurst was able tolaugh along with everyone else at the mention of his difficult to pronounce name.He had been allowed to grow unrestricted, but not unchecked. While his parentwere liberal, they still gave him t he attention necessary, and the room toevolve. This independence helped him to be who he was, invincible to insult,injury, and always in control.When Yolanda and Rudy first met they were in English class. He hadshowed up late and totally unprepared for class, the exact opposite of her. Shemarveled at how he could walk in late, take what she thought of as anembarrassing scene, and laugh about it. She always went to class early, had allof her books and was well prepared for class.

constitution :: essays research papers

The Constitution itself did not mention political parties, and it was assumed that none was going to arise. But this was soon proven wrong when the debates between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists in 1787 and 1788 campaign into a two party system. This soon led to a permanent feature in American policies. In early times, groups of people formed transient assembly and voted together either for or against a specific policy. When the policy was settled, the assemblies would dissolve. The Federalists and Anti-Federalist was sort of like these assemblies, but they didnt dissolve that easily.The 1790s became known as the Federalist Era because a Federalist President led it. Political parties began to form around two leaders, Hamilton and Jefferson. The Federalist Party supported Hamilton and his financial program. The opposing party that was known as the Democratic-Republican Party supported Jefferson and tried to elect candidates in different soils who opposed Hamiltons program. T he French Revolution later hardened the formation of these two parties. Americans became acutely divided over whether it should or should not support France.The Federalist strength was greatest in the northeastern states and the places that favored the growth of a federal power. They supported British and aided businesses, national bank, and tariffs. Made up of the rich businessmen and large landowners. The Democratic-Republican power were the party whose supporters were mainly from the southern states and where people favored the protection of state rights and a weak central government. They supported French, favored agriculture, no national bank, and opposed tariffs. 2). Explain the circumstances that lead to the incorporation of a Bill of Rights in our federal Constitution. State two rights guaranteed to you by the Bill of Rights, and explain what privileges each right grants to you and what privileges each right grants to you and what obligations each right demands to you.

Killing as a Moral Barometer in Macbeth :: Free Macbeth Essays

cleanup position as a Moral Barometer in Macbeth In William Shakespeares play Macbeth, the title character is a killer. Through the course of the play, he kills five different people or groups of people, one in each act. These are, respectively, Macdonwald, Duncan, Banquo, Macduffs family, and Young Siward. These five cleanup spots are different. In the beginning, Macbeth kills for his king. He then suffers a fall from grace before finally becoming a noble figure again in the end. But more fire than this process is the way in which Shakespeare shows us the changes in Macbeths character. Shakespeare uses the killings as a sort of barometer to illustrate these changes. Before the play begins, Macbeths Scotland and Norway fight a war. In this war, Macbeth is a hero, admired for his courage and strength But alls too weak For brave Macbeth (well he deserves that name) Disdaining Fortune, with his brandished steel, Which smoked like bloody execution, Like valors minion, carved out his act Till he faced the slave Which neer shook hands, nor bade farewell to him Till he unseamed him from the nave to th chops And fixed his head upon our battlements. ( schoolmaster, 1.2.17-25) The killing that the senior pilot describes here is Macbeths most heroic killing. The Captain admires him for his remarkable bravery. The other members of the Scottish court continue in praising him. Macbeths motive for killing here is, contrasted all his later murders, not a personal reason. It is a selfless, courageous, heroic deed that is thought to be able to save Scotland from utter destruction. Shakespeare uses this killing to innovate the audience to Macbeth. Here, we see Macbeth as a hero. This is possibly the most potent way in which Shakespeare could bring in Macbeths heroism to us. What could be more heroic than killing for ones king? Similarly, what could be so evil as killing ones king? Macbeth, thanks to his bravery in the war, is made the Thane of Cawdor, part of a three-pa rt prophecy precondition him by the Weird Sisters. Macbeth yearns to complete the prophecy and become King. Yet at this point, Macbeth is torn between killing and not killing. He is loyal to Duncan Hes here in double trust/First, as I am his kinsman and his subject,/Strong both against the deed then, as his host,/Who should against his murderer shut the door,/Not bear the knife myself.Killing as a Moral Barometer in Macbeth Free Macbeth EssaysKilling as a Moral Barometer in Macbeth In William Shakespeares play Macbeth, the title character is a killer. Through the course of the play, he kills five different people or groups of people, one in each act. These are, respectively, Macdonwald, Duncan, Banquo, Macduffs family, and Young Siward. These five killings are different. In the beginning, Macbeth kills for his king. He then suffers a fall from grace before finally becoming a noble figure again in the end. But more raise than this process is the way in which Shakespeare shows us the changes in Macbeths character. Shakespeare uses the killings as a sort of barometer to illustrate these changes. Before the play begins, Macbeths Scotland and Norway fight a war. In this war, Macbeth is a hero, admired for his courage and strength But alls too weak For brave Macbeth (well he deserves that name) Disdaining Fortune, with his brandished steel, Which smoked like bloody execution, Like valors minion, carved out his flight Till he faced the slave Which neer shook hands, nor bade farewell to him Till he unseamed him from the nave to th chops And fixed his head upon our battlements. (Captain, 1.2.17-25) The killing that the Captain describes here is Macbeths most heroic killing. The Captain admires him for his remarkable bravery. The other members of the Scottish court continue in praising him. Macbeths motive for killing here is, opposed all his later murders, not a personal reason. It is a selfless, courageous, heroic deed that is thought to be able to save Scotlan d from utter destruction. Shakespeare uses this killing to introduce the audience to Macbeth. Here, we see Macbeth as a hero. This is possibly the most potent way in which Shakespeare could introduce Macbeths heroism to us. What could be more heroic than killing for ones king? Similarly, what could be so evil as killing ones king? Macbeth, thanks to his bravery in the war, is made the Thane of Cawdor, part of a three-part prophecy habituated him by the Weird Sisters. Macbeth yearns to complete the prophecy and become King. Yet at this point, Macbeth is torn between killing and not killing. He is loyal to Duncan Hes here in double trust/First, as I am his kinsman and his subject,/Strong both against the deed then, as his host,/Who should against his murderer shut the door,/Not bear the knife myself.

Killing as a Moral Barometer in Macbeth :: Free Macbeth Essays

Killing as a Moral Barometer in Macbeth In William Shakespeares blowout Macbeth, the title character is a killer. Through the course of the dramatic event, he kills quint different people or groups of people, one in each act. These are, respectively, Macdonwald, Duncan, Banquo, Macduffs family, and Young Siward. These tailfin killings are different. In the beginning, Macbeth kills for his king. He then suffers a fall from grace before finally becoming a noble figure again in the end. But more interesting than this process is the way in which Shakespeare shows us the changes in Macbeths character. Shakespeare uses the killings as a sort of barometer to illustrate these changes. Before the play begins, Macbeths Scotland and Norway charge up a war. In this war, Macbeth is a hero, admired for his courage and strength But alls too weak For brave Macbeth (well he deserves that name) Disdaining Fortune, with his brandished steel, Which smoked like bloody execution, the likes of valors minion, carved out his passage Till he faced the slave Which neer shook hands, nor bade farewell to him Till he unseamed him from the nave to th chops And determined his head upon our battlements. (Captain, 1.2.17-25) The killing that the Captain describes here is Macbeths most heroic killing. The Captain admires him for his remarkable bravery. The other members of the Scottish court continue in praising him. Macbeths pauperism for killing here is, unlike all his later murders, not a personal reason. It is a selfless, courageous, heroic deed that is thought to be able to remedy Scotland from utter destruction. Shakespeare uses this killing to introduce the audience to Macbeth. Here, we see Macbeth as a hero. This is possibly the most potent way in which Shakespeare could introduce Macbeths heroism to us. What could be more heroic than killing for ones king? Similarly, what could be so evil as killing ones king? Macbeth, thanks to his bravery in the war, is made the Thane of Cawd or, divulge of a three- unwrap prophecy given him by the Weird Sisters. Macbeth yearns to complete the prophecy and become King. Yet at this point, Macbeth is torn between killing and not killing. He is loyal to Duncan Hes here in double trust/First, as I am his kinsman and his subject,/Strong both against the deed then, as his host,/Who should against his murderer shut the door,/not bear the knife myself.Killing as a Moral Barometer in Macbeth Free Macbeth EssaysKilling as a Moral Barometer in Macbeth In William Shakespeares play Macbeth, the title character is a killer. Through the course of the play, he kills five different people or groups of people, one in each act. These are, respectively, Macdonwald, Duncan, Banquo, Macduffs family, and Young Siward. These five killings are different. In the beginning, Macbeth kills for his king. He then suffers a fall from grace before finally becoming a noble figure again in the end. But more interesting than this process is the way in which Shakespeare shows us the changes in Macbeths character. Shakespeare uses the killings as a sort of barometer to illustrate these changes. Before the play begins, Macbeths Scotland and Norway weigh a war. In this war, Macbeth is a hero, admired for his courage and strength But alls too weak For brave Macbeth (well he deserves that name) Disdaining Fortune, with his brandished steel, Which smoked like bloody execution, corresponding valors minion, carved out his passage Till he faced the slave Which neer shook hands, nor bade farewell to him Till he unseamed him from the nave to th chops And stock-still his head upon our battlements. (Captain, 1.2.17-25) The killing that the Captain describes here is Macbeths most heroic killing. The Captain admires him for his remarkable bravery. The other members of the Scottish court continue in praising him. Macbeths occasion for killing here is, unlike all his later murders, not a personal reason. It is a selfless, courageous, heroic de ed that is thought to be able to render Scotland from utter destruction. Shakespeare uses this killing to introduce the audience to Macbeth. Here, we see Macbeth as a hero. This is possibly the most potent way in which Shakespeare could introduce Macbeths heroism to us. What could be more heroic than killing for ones king? Similarly, what could be so evil as killing ones king? Macbeth, thanks to his bravery in the war, is made the Thane of Cawdor, part of a three-part prophecy given him by the Weird Sisters. Macbeth yearns to complete the prophecy and become King. Yet at this point, Macbeth is torn between killing and not killing. He is loyal to Duncan Hes here in double trust/First, as I am his kinsman and his subject,/Strong both against the deed then, as his host,/Who should against his murderer shut the door,/not bear the knife myself.